Which of the following is NOT a consequence of failing to comply with the ACAA?

Choosing the option that indicates a lack of consequence under the ACAA highlights an important understanding of the implications of non-compliance with regulations that promote accessibility in air travel.

When an airline does not comply with the Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA), there are several potential negative outcomes that can arise. Notably, civil penalties can be imposed, which serve as a financial deterrent against violating accessibility regulations. Individuals affected by discrimination can also file damage claims, seeking compensation for their experiences, which highlights the personal and legal ramifications that arise from non-compliance. Additionally, federal or state authorities may initiate legal action to enforce compliance, which can further escalate the repercussions for airlines.

In contrast, the option indicating reputational benefits stands out as the correct answer to the question because it misinterprets the nature of the consequences of non-compliance. There are no reputational advantages to not adhering to ACAA standards; rather, non-compliance usually harms an airline's reputation, possibly resulting in public backlash, loss of customer trust, and negative media coverage. Thus, the correct identification of this option underscores an essential aspect of business practice: compliance with accessibility laws is crucial for maintaining both legal integrity and a positive public image.